Legal Opinion

United States v. Renardo Peebles

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1996No. 95-2336PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Renardo Peebles challenges the District Court’s 1 denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and his sentence. We affirm.

In accordance with a written plea agreement and stipulation of facts, Peebles pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm (Count I), possessing cocaine base (crack) with intent to distribute (Count II), and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense (Count III). Six months after pleading guilty, and less than two weeks before his scheduled sentencing, Pee-bles wrote the District Court, asserting that a conflict of interest had arisen…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. John Robert Boone, United States of America v. David Brook LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Wallace Andre Jackson, United States of America v. Vaniel GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Mark A. NewsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Sanford R. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Mustafa A. AbdullahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Tommy HaubrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. MiellDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010
  3. United States v. Arnold J. PembertonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Demetrius JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. James StorholmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API