Legal Opinion

Matter of Dawson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by John W. Wilson et al., from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 23, 1888, which affirmed an order of Special Term, the substance of which is hereinafter stated. In June, 1885, the said appellants began an action in the Supreme Court in the first district against the petitioner Dawson, to recover damages for breach of contract, and obtained an attachment therein on the ground of defendant’s non-residence.

Read the full summary

Appeal by John W. Wilson et al., from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 23, 1888, which affirmed an order of Special Term, the substance of which is hereinafter stated. In June, 1885, the said appellants began an action in the Supreme Court in the first district against the petitioner Dawson, to recover damages for breach of contract, and obtained an attachment therein on the ground of defendant’s non-residence. This attachment was issued to Alexander V. Davidson, then sheriff of Yew York county, and in September following he…

1Opinion of the CourtEarl, J.

In June, 1885, Wilson & Knowlton commenced an action in the Supreme Court against Dawson to recover damages for breach of contract and obtained an attachment against Dawson’s property on the ground of his non-residence. The attachment was issued to Alexander Y. Davidson, then sheriff of 27ew York county, and he attached a certain debt owing from McDowell, Pierce & Co. to Dawson. Such proceedings. were thereafter taken in that action on behalf of the plaintiffs that McDowell, Pierce & Co. paid upon the debt attached, to Davidson, as sheriff, the sum of $2,316.43. Thereafter, and before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. HopsonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Peck v. . TiffanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duffy v. DawsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  2. Kukowski v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API