Legal Opinion

Barclay v. Early

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 18, 2018No. 17–P–372Published

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Robert Barclay, appeals from the dismissal for want of prosecution of his civil lawsuit to compel the District Attorney for Worcester County to conduct deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing that has already been rejected repeatedly in postconviction rulings in his criminal case. Concluding that the dismissal for want of prosecution without an opportunity to be heard several months after the District Attorney asked for a hearing to be rescheduled was an abuse of discretion, we reverse.

1. Background. In 1997, a Worcester County jury convicted the plaintiff of murder in the first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Commonwealth v. CoonanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. SchumacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Bucchiere v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Monahan v. WashburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API