Frick & Co. v. Moore
Supreme Court of Georgia
Verdict. Evidence. Equity. Promissory notes. Consideration. Practice. Before Judge Roney. Richmond superior court. April term, 1888. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
It appears from the record m this ease, that Mrs. Moore filed her bill against Erick & Co. and others in the court below, for injunction, relief, etc. She alleged in her bill that, in the year 1885, she executed and delivered to Erick & Co. twelve promissory notes, each for $100 and interest, except one which is for $126.09. *161She alleged that these notes were procured from her by duress, and for the purpose of suppressing a criminal prosecution ; that Erick & Co. had charged her son with larceny after trust of a. certain steam engine, and had threatened a criminal prosecution…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Montgomery v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Bartow Guano Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Iteld v. KarpCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. JarrettDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1942
- McConnell v. Cherokee National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.