Legal Opinion
Sanborn v. Detroit, Bay City & Alpena Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error to Alpena. (Kelley, J.) Negligence ease. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This cause was tried in the Alpena circuit-court. Plaintiff had verdict and judgment. Defendant brings error.
The first count of the declaration alleges that—
“The defendant, at and before the time of committing the grievances hereinafter mentioned, was a corporation organized and existing under the general railroad laws of this State,- and was operating and running its railroad and business between Alger and the city off Alpena, portions of its road and.tracks passing through Alpena county; and the said portions of its said road and tracks which passed through Alpena county were not, and never…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cahill v. CincinnatiCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
- Bell v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Harty v. . Central R.R. Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Norton v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Cooper v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lepard v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Johnston v. DelanoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Philadelphia & Baltimore Central Railroad v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Everett v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Wavle v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.