United States v. Dale P. Ewing, D/B/A Action Publishing Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The main thrust of this appeal from a conviction of ten counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1461, 1 knowing use of the mails for the delivery of obscene material, has been blunted by the recent decision in United States v. Reidel, 402 U.S. 351, 91 S.Ct. 1410, 28 L.Ed.2d 813 (1971), which reaffirmed the constitutionality of the Act. Remaining for our consideration is a challenge to the court’s charge and the question whether sufficient evidence was introduced to submit the case to the jury under the standards of Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. ReidelSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mishkin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. ChaffeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Willie Bell, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. August Carl BenzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Chris PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.