Legal Opinion
MATTER OF CITY OF SYRACUSE v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 1985PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (101 AD2d 653) and agree with that court that the method used in calculating the equalization rate was rational and the rate fixed was supported by substantial evidence.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Syracuse v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by13 opinions
- Town of Pleasant Valley v. New York State Board of Real Property ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Town of Greenburgh v. New York State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Town of Patterson v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Town of Hardenburgh v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Town of Mamakating v. New York State Board of Real Property ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.