Legal Opinion
Graham v. Smith
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 17, 2003No. CIV. 03-195-P-HPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
HORNBY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction against a pending arbitration proceeding. They argue that they never agreed to submit their disputes to arbitration. I find that the plaintiffs have met the likelihood of success standard on their claim that they did not individually agree to arbitrate any disputes and satisfy the other criteria for preliminary injunc-tive relief. I therefore Grant the motion. 1
Background
The plaintiffs Robert Graham and Michael Shane (“Graham” and “Shane”) are officers of Vital Basics, Inc.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Intergen N v. v. GrinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED v. Willard S. HARTMANN, Leona R. Hartmann, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
- MONAVIE, LLC v. Quixtar Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2009
- Winterwood Farm, LLC v. JER, INC.District Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Andrews v. RardinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Bangor Savings Bank v. Darling Consulting GroupDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.