Legal Opinion
Fenner v. Wyeth
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided December 11, 2012No. Case No. 4:05-CV-1101 CDPPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge.
This action 'is before me on plaintiff Antonia Fenner’s renewed motion to remand. I find remand is warranted because complete diversity did not exist at the time of filing, and defendants have failed to meet their burden of showing plaintiffs, were ■ fraudulently misjoined in order to defeat .federal jurisdiction.
*797I. Procedural History
In 2005, twenty-five plaintiffs from multiple states sued various drugmakers and retailers for injuries stemming from hormone replacement therapy (HRT) drugs the defendants allegedly produced, marketed, or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Onepoint Solutions, Llc, a Georgia Limited Liability Company v. Michael Borchert William CatuzziCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Genosource, LLC v. Inguran, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
- Fabius v. Medinexo USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Guddeck ex rel. Guddeck v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Lampton v. C R Bard IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020
- Lampton v. C R Bard IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.