Legal Opinion

Wood v. Dailey

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1919No. Civ. No. 2344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing to vacate and set aside the judgment and enter a judgment in favor of the defendant. Leslie R Hewitt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order refusing to vacate' and set aside the judgment and enter a judgment in favor of the defendant.

By her cross-complaint defendant sought to recover damages for the unlawful detention by the plaintiff of an automobile of the defendant from the first day of March to the eighteenth day of October, 1915. It was alleged that the reasonable value of the use of the automobile was the sum of ten dollars per day, and that defendant was damaged on account of the unlawful detention in the sum of $2,320. All of the allegations of the cross-complaint…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maloof v. MaloofCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Mohr v. North Rawhide Mining & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nestor v. BurrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API