Ingalls v. Ingalls
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Libel for divorce. The Superior Court made a decree nisi of divorce and alimony for the libellant, and the libellee alleged exceptions, which were duly allowed, but neglected to enter them in this court. The libellant filed a complaint to the full court, alleging the above facts, and praying that the decree might be affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The St. of 1888, c. 94, amends the Pub. Sts. c. 150, § 16, by providing that, when a party who has appealed, or whose exceptions have been allowed, neglects to enter such appeal or exceptions in this court, the court in which the exceptions were allowed, or from which the appeal was taken, “ may upon the application of the adverse party, upon due notice to all parties interested, order the judgment, opinion, ruling, or order affirmed.” This statute was intended to obviate the necessity of applying by complaint to the Supreme Judicial Court for the affirmation of the original…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Littlejohn v. LittlejohnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Capobinco v. SamorakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Greenia v. GreeniaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Burlingame v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Daly v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.