Legal Opinion

State v. Parks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1985No. 8514SC667PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress the in-court identification of defendant by the victim. Defendant contends, specifically, that the in-court identification of defendant by the victim was irreparably tainted by a prosecution arranged pre-trial identification procedure. The victim testified that several months prior to trial, the prosecutor told her to go to the courtroom to see if she could identify her assailant. She was informed by the prosecutor that defendant would be sitting on the back row and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. JollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. In Re LiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. MoulCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. In re L.I.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. In re M.L.T.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API