Legal Opinion

Gatti v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1933No. Law No. 77,890Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LETTS, J.

The liability of the plaintiff is limited to the price he agreed to pay. When the contractor died, Gatti, the owner, was liable only for such portion of the contract price as represented the work and material already furnished. It seems clear that when the owner has discharged such obligation, by payment under his contract with the contractor, anything fur*154tlier which he may do by paying it again to the creditors of the contractor, or otherwise, becomes his voluntary act. When he has fully paid the contractor for the work done and the material furnished and has voluntarily…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Growall v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. Ponti v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API