Legal Opinion
Kinard v. Crosby
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 6, 1993No. 23884PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chandler, Justice:
On appeal is a jury verdict awarded to Respondents for intentional interference with a contractual relationship. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Fred Collins Jr., Mike Fletcher, and Collins Coin, Inc. (Collins) 1 and Respondents Danner Kinard and Kico Amusements, Inc. (Kico) 2 are both in the coin-operated amusement machine industry. The dispute here centers on the location of such machines at the Circle C Truck Stop, owned and operated by Crosby Enterprises and Scott Crosby. Crosby Enterprises, Scott Crosby (Crosby) and Collins were joint defendants in the Circuit Court action.
In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gamble v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- McCall v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Camp v. Springs Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eldeco, Inc. v. Charleston County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Toyota of Florence, Inc. v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Southern Contracting, Inc. v. H.C. Brown Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Collins Entertainment Corp. v. Coats & Coats Rental AmusementCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Orangeburg Sausage Co. v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.