Legal Opinion

American State Bank & Trust Co. v. Mariades

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1937No. Appeal, 24PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Defendant filed in the court below exceptions to and a motion to set aside a sheriff’s sale on a judgment con fessed on a bond accompanying a mortgage. After argument the motion was denied. He later applied for reargument and for the taking of testimony. This was also refused. The appeal followed.

Because no testimony was taken and since plaintiff by responsive answer denied most of defendant’s allegations of fact (Harr v. Bernheimer, 322 Pa. 412; Di Trolio v. Parisi, 317 Pa. 507) the only relevant averments possibly open for our consideration are that the advertised…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harr, SEC. of Bk. v. BernheimerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Hettler v. ShephardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Somerville v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Senge, for Use v. Border (Levin)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Watkins v. JusticeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. BlickleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Baton Coal Company AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Mehalic v. Westmoreland County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Bell v. MOCKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API