Legal Opinion

Dray v. Vardenski

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 8, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the Housing Court of the City of Boston for possession and rent, entered in a summary process action. 1. The tenant’s first contention is that the judge abused his discretion under Mass.R.Civ.P. 81(a), as amended, 367 Mass. 917 (1975), in denying his discovery motion.1 At the time the discovery motion was heard, discovery in the Housing Court was governed by Rule 21 of the Preliminary Rules of the Housing Court of the City of *862Boston (1972) ,2 In view of the tenant’s failure to meet the specified time limitations imposed by Rule 21 for requesting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Karl W. Hahn v. Joseph GottliebCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. Francis M. Langevin v. Chenango Court, Inc., and Robert J. Smith, Deputy Director of the Federal Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pleasant Travel, Inc. v. ButlerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
  2. Levenson v. Brockton Taunton Gas Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API