Legal Opinion
(HC) Sutter v. Gastelo
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 22, 2019No. 1:19-cv-01091Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON CARL SUTTER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01091-SKO-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE TO FILE MOTION TO AMEND TO NAME 13 v. A PROPER RESPONDENT 14 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF [THIRTY DAY DEADLINE] CALIFORNIA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 On August 12, 2019, Petitioner filed the instant federal petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 in this Court. He names the People of the State of California as Respondent in this matter. 20 However, the People of the State of California is not a proper respondent. Petitioner…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Jerry F. Stanley v. California Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Mark Brittingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Paul Ashley, AKA Walter Paul Foster v. The State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.