Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Clerk

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 3, 1978No. 17PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENTELL, Clerk.

RULE 7, ALABAMA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET FEE — PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE IN A CONTEMPT PROCEEDING

Mr. Allen L. Tapley, Administrative Director of Courts, has requested my opinion, as Clerk of the Supreme Court, as follows:

In Opinion No. 3, May 4,1977, you stated that a petition for rule to show cause in a contempt proceeding should be treated as an original filing for docket fee purposes. Does this opinion authorize a docket fee for a petition for rule to show cause filed prior to a final decree or filed pursuant to an interlocutory decree?

Section…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Tetter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Musgrove v. United States Pipe and Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Falk v. FalkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hicks v. HicksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. Opinion by the ClerkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Opinion of the ClerkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Opinion of the ClerkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Opinion of the ClerkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API