Legal Opinion
Zachos v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1949No. 12092PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to our order 1 on motion for rehearing, the district judge has now heard “further evidence solely on the issue of pri- or use, and made findings of fact 2 and conclusions of law, 3 and caused same to be certified" to us.
The parties have been heard orally and on briefs. The question whether the findings will be approved by us or set aside as clearly erroneous is now before us for decision.
Pointing to the testimony adduced by it, appellant, attacks the reasons given by the court for its findings as unsound, insists that its evidence established prior use in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smith v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Cowles Co. v. Frost-White Paper MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- James C. Hobbs v. United States of America, Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Inglett & Company, Inc. v. Everglades Fertilizer Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. DudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.