Legal Opinion

Conrey v. Seligman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1924No. File No. 5493PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

The parties to this action Nvere stockholders in the Columbia Equity Exchange, a farmers’ elevator company. The company was in financial distress. At a meeting of the stockholders in February, 1921, the financial situation of the company was disclosed, showing an indebtedness of from $30,000 to $35,-ooo.* It was proposed that each of the 70 odd stockholders give his promissory note to the company in the sum of $500 for the purpose of keeping the company afloat. Defendant 'Seligman executed and delivered his note in said sum. This action was brought to recover on said note. Plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Skordal v. StantonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Continental National Bank v. DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. State v. PeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wenzlaff v. Tripp State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State v. PeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Conley v. LunzmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Continental Life Ins. v. BarnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Swanson v. SandersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API