Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Young

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 13, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit. Heard by the court, jury trial being waived.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.

Suit to collect a town tax, which the defendant resists upon two grounds: —

First. That the assessment list does not properly describe the estates taxed. The list is made up as follows: —

Names. Description. Real. Personal. Tax.

Young, Cyrus, 24 a. home estate, 20 a. T. Young lot, 9 a. woodland, Whipple lot, 800 800 200 12,60

Unquestionably a valid assessment must describe the property assessed with sufficient clearness and certainty to inform the owner of the assessment, and to show upon what property the tax is levied. The description must be sufficient to identify the property, in ease of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. San Francisco Sav. UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Bird v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Lawrence v. FastIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. State v. Eureka Consolidated Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1872
  5. People v. HastingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reid v. Southern Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. Bryant v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
  3. Rubin Bryant and Andrew Kennedy v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Company, a Corporation, and United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API