Pfister v. Wells
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: D. H. JohNsoN, Circuit Judge. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMaeshall, J.
The defendant Wells interposed an answer, properly verified, which contained denials, on information and belief, of material allegations of the complaint. The-plaintiff moved, on the pleadings and affidavits in support of the truth of the allegations of the complaint which were denied, for an order striking out the answer as sham. The defendant Wells did not support the answer by any affidavits, other than the verification, which was in due form, and the court granted the motion. Erom the order which was. accordingly entered, this appeal was taken.
The question is presented of whether, where…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wayland v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Thompson v. . the Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Newman v. . Supervisors of Livingston Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Roby v. HallockNew York Supreme Court · 1878
- Colt v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pacific Mill Co. v. InmanOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Moore v. MayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Slama v. DehmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- King v. WaiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897