Legal Opinion

People v. Tossey

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1927No. Docket No. 979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The information herein, charging the defendants with the crime of robbery, was filed October 21, 1926. On their arraignment two days later the defendants appeared without counsel and, after being duly informed of their rights, stated that they did not desire counsel to represent them. Tossey, who will be referred to as the defendant, stated that his true name is James Trautman. They both entered pleas of guilty and waived time for pronouncing sentence. The court thereupon examined Tossey, who was not under oath, however, in part as follows: “Q. How old are you, Trautman? A. Fifteen. Q.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. OxnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. In Re Application of TasseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. In Re WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In Re TomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hinkle v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. LuzovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API