Schultz v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a presumptive parole release date determination which we *648find to be without error except insofar as an improper “offense of commitment” was utilized; the Commission has conceded error in this regard.

Appellant also contends that the Commission erred by utilizing current parole guidelines which were not in effect at the time appellant committed his offense. This court has previously held that such use of current guidelines is not an impermissible ex post facto application of law. See e.g., Britt v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079…