Legal Opinion
The Lakeport
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 27, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
Originally this proceeding in rem was against three vessels, but later the libel was amended and continued as against the steamer Lakeport alone, which, at the time of the employment in.question, was owned by the Lakes & St. Lawrence Transit Company. The basis of the libel is to recover seamen’s wage for an unexpired term during the 1923 season of navigation. It includes assigned claims to libelant, who was assistant engineer, of George R. Vosburgh, chief engineer, and Joseph Ashby, assistant engineer. The evidence shows that wages for the time actually spent by libelant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The SaturnusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- The AugustineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
- The U. & I.District Court, D. Maine · 1924
- The SaturnusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fred I. Putnam and James A. Overman v. Harry C. Lower, John Kadlec, George S. Herning, Edgar L. Peecher, William E. Barquist and Norman L. BunkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Old Point Fish Co. v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- In Re Marine Transit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Medina v. Marvirazon Compania Naviera, SADistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
- The Eastern ShoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.