Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Deane

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1928No. 959-4913PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

The writ of error was granted

herein to the judgment of the Court of 'Civil Appeals for the Eighth District, wherein the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. 294 S. W. 347. The ease is a will contest, and the sole question presented is whether or not the witness Pauline Mitchell, wife of the son of the deceased, was a competent witness under the statute to testify as to transactions with the deceased.

*718The witness’ fiusband was a party to the proceeding, but she was neither a necessary or proper party nor was she an actual party. Article 3716, Revised Oivil Statutes, provides:

“In. actions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simpson v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Gamble v. ButcheeTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mitchell v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. International Traveler's Ass'n v. BettisTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ragsdale v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hutto v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hall v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Lehmann v. KrahlTexas Supreme Court · 1955

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API