Mitchell v. Deane
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.
The writ of error was granted
herein to the judgment of the Court of 'Civil Appeals for the Eighth District, wherein the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. 294 S. W. 347. The ease is a will contest, and the sole question presented is whether or not the witness Pauline Mitchell, wife of the son of the deceased, was a competent witness under the statute to testify as to transactions with the deceased.
*718The witness’ fiusband was a party to the proceeding, but she was neither a necessary or proper party nor was she an actual party. Article 3716, Revised Oivil Statutes, provides:
“In. actions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simpson v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Gamble v. ButcheeTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Mitchell v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
3Cited by30 opinions
- International Traveler's Ass'n v. BettisTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Ragsdale v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Hutto v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Hall v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Lehmann v. KrahlTexas Supreme Court · 1955
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.