Legal Opinion

Deardorff v. Everhartt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. 8. H. Woodson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

This is a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien. *38against a certain lot and building in the City of Kansas owned by appellants, Halpine and Lynch, the latter of whom contracted with Everbartt to erect the building. The evidence for defendants tended to show that a portion of the lumber purchased by Everhartt was not used in the erection of the building, although purchased by him for that purpose. The court, for plaintiff, declared the law to be that: “ The declarations of Everhartt, or his foreman, at tbe time of the purchase of the lumber sued for, as to the purposes for which it was purchased,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons, Garth & Co. v. CarrierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Morrison v. HancockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  3. Schulenberg v. Prairie Home InstituteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Grace v. NesbittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Ward v. NoldeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. Prince v. Neal-Millard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Fitch v. HowittOregon Supreme Court · 1898

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API