Legal Opinion

Dlouhy v. Frymier

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1993No. 92CA005517PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cook, Presiding Judge.

Lawrence D. Dlouhy (“Dlouhy”) appeals from the trial court’s rescission of the land installment contract he had with Bacil and Patricia Frymier (“Frymiers”) and from the trial court’s dismissal of his appeal of the ancillary arbitration award in the case. We conclude that the rescission is supportable based on principles of contractual misrepresentation. Further, we conclude that the trial court erred by dismissing other pending issues in the case without the notice required by Civ.R. 41(B)(1).

FACTS

In 1988, the Frymiers listed their farm for sale in order to enable them…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Finomore v. EpsteinOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Geico Financial Services, Inc. v. VRR, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dimon v. MansyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rosepark Properties, Ltd. v. BuessOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Bavelis v. Doukas (In re Bavelis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  4. Truetried Service Co. v. HagerOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Vinebrook Homes, L.L.C. v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API