Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Di Lallo

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 21, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The amount sought in the complaint was within the monetary jurisdiction of the City Court of Bye (O’Farrell v. Martin, 161 Mise. 353). However, in the absence of any showing of consent of the parties, the court was without jurisdiction to render decision herein after 30 days from the time when the case was submitted (HCCA, § 1304), and the judgment entered thereon was a nullity (cf. Patrzykowski v. Mursten, 250 App. Div. 355; Smith v. Weitz, 14 Misc 2d 519).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.

Concur — Martuscello, Groat and Coyle, JJ.

Judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patrzykowski v. MurstenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Smith v. Weitz, New York County Courts1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Powell v. Mountainside Agency, Inc.Poughkeepsie City Court · 1996
  2. Powell v. Mountainside Agency, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API