Legal Opinion

Hirt v. Richardson

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided January 8, 2001No. 1:99-cv-00933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(c). Defendants assert in this Motion that Plaintiffs’ claims are now moot and that Plaintiffs now lack standing. The Court will grant Defendants’ Motion.

I. Introduction

In this action under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief to enjoin Defendants from shipping nuclear material, mixed oxide uranium (“MOX”), from the United States and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Velzen v. Grand Valley State UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API