Stephens v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of injuring a house belonging to Barham.

Among other things, it is contended the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction. The testimony for the State discloses that defendant had a contract with Barham by which he was to paint two houses for the sum of nineteen dollars. They had a disagreement and Barham ordered appellant to leave the premises. When this occurred the alleged owner of the house went away. The door which is alleged to have been injured he testifies was in good condition. That evening the door was defaced and injured,…