Legal Opinion

King v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided May 25, 1966No. Claim No. 43107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDorothea E. Donaldson, J.

This claim arises out of an appropriation of land no part of which was owned by claimant but over which was held a right of way. Claimant’s property is situated in the City of Poughkeepsie and is a completely unimproved tract, two thirds of which is zoned for residential use and one third for commercial use. For ease of reference and because the easement of way permitted the commercially zoned section to be so used, it will be called the dominant tenement. The westerly line of the dominant tenement bordered land owned by Highway Displays, Inc., which property in turn *338was interposed between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Slepian v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Roth v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API