Legal Opinion
Brunacini v. Loomis
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.
The petitioner proceeds nnder article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an order: (1) To compel respondent Loomis, as Supervisor of the Town of North Harmony, to issue to the petitioner a license to engage in the junk business; (2) Directing the respondents “ to disregard the ordinance * * * as if the same had never been enacted;” (3) Restraining the Town Board of said town from enacting any legislation preventing the petitioner from using his property as “ a used car parts and junk business.”
The petition states that the petitioner is a “ citizen ” of New York State, “ a resident taxpayer” of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- People v. . Beakes Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Concordia Collegiate Institute v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Koch v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Brunacini v. LoomisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961