Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Local 126, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 5, 1984No. 83-1061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

After the complaining party’s death, another member of a local intervened in union proceedings challenging an election. Because no objection to the intervention was made at that time, we conclude that the union waived its constitutional provision establishing the period within which complaints could be lodged. In that circumstance, the internal union remedies were properly exhausted and therefore the Seere-tary of Labor was authorized to pursue the election challenge in court under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959. Because the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wirtz v. Glass Bottle BlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Hodgson v. Local Union 6799, United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor v. District 6, United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  4. Marshall v. United SteelworkersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Donovan v. Local 126, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Missouri Pacific System Federation Joint Protective BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Donovan v. Local 126, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, ClcCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Raymond J. Donovan v. Missouri Pacific System Federation Joint Protective BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API