Legal Opinion

Polk v. Afflick

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 18, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The sole question raised by this appeal is whether or not the chancerv court erred in setting aside the sale by the receiver to E. M. Polk for certain property belonging to the insolvent corporation and accepting the increased offer by 'O. W. Afflick for said property.

The record shows that E. M. Polk bid $3,250 for certain vacant lots in West Helena and $525 for the equity in a certain house and lot in West Helena. This property was struck off to him by the receiver, and'E. M. Polk complied with the terms of sale by depositing a certified check for $500…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. George v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Miller v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Brasch v. MumeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Stevenson v. GaultSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Wells v. LenoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Southland Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Afflick v. Pekin Wood Products Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1955
  3. New England Securities Co. v. AfflickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API