Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 2, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Van Sant, Commissioner

Reversing.

Appellant was convicted of 'grand larceny and sentenced to serve two years in the State Reformatory. On this appeal, he urges six grounds for reversal: (1) the court erred in failing to continue the case because counsel for appellant had not had sufficient time to prepare appellant’s defense; (2) the lower court erred by failing to continue the case because of the absence of defendant’s witness, Sam Ford; (3) the lower court erred in refusing to require the Commonwealth to admit the truth of the statements as to the testimony which would be given by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Cook v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  4. Noe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Faught v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970
  3. Tinsley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  4. Mathis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API