Deloach v. Sarratt
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gage, J., Cherokee, Supplementary proceedings by plaintiff, in James E. deLoach and Elizabeth deLoach against A. A. Sarratt, against E. G. Stacey, trustee, and S. G. and W. J. Sarratt, as administrators of A. A. Sarratt.
Read the full summary
Before Gage, J., Cherokee, Supplementary proceedings by plaintiff, in James E. deLoach and Elizabeth deLoach against A. A. Sarratt, against E. G. Stacey, trustee, and S. G. and W. J. Sarratt, as administrators of A. A. Sarratt. The Circuit decree herein is as follows: On 7th August, 1899,1 made an order designating Arthur L. Gaston, Esq., to examine one E. G. Stacey, of Gaffney, concerning certain property belonging to the estate of A. A. Sarratt, deceased, and alleged to be in his possession. The order was made pursuant to section 314 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The examination was had…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice McIver.
This is an appeal from an order granted by his Honor, Judge Gage, made in a proceeding supplementary to an execution, issued to enforce a judgment obtained by the said James E. deLoach and Elizabeth deLoach against the said A. A. Sarratt, in his lifetime. This execution having been returned nulla bona in the lifetime of the judgment debtor, and the judgment creditors, who are the appellants herein, having learned that the estate of their judgment debtor had become entitled to a large sum of money, the proceeds of a policy…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Weatherly v. MedlinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- George H. Hurst & Sons v. RhameSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925