People v. Meegan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified by reinstating Indictments Nos. 40,288-A, 40,288-B and 40,288-C, and, as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: Defendants McParlane and Penders received immunity from the use of their statements given before the investigating unit of the police department, but not transactional immunity. As the Court of Appeals pointed out in People v Avant (33 NY2d 265, 272): " 'Complete immunity from prosecution may be obtained by a prospective defendant, or any witness, only by strict compliance with the procedural requirements of our immunity statutes’ (People v. Laino [10 NY2d 161,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. AvantNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. OakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. LainoNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. EdmonsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Shales v. LeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. Hawkrigg, New York County Courts1988
- State v. EdmonsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1987