Legal Opinion

Krebs v. Nicholson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — Hon. Obed Caswell, Judge. Action to recover the value of a road cart and single harness "taken and sold under an execution against the plaintiff. Trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

The plaintiff’s only occupation at the time of the levy was that of traveling from stand to stand with a stallion which he used for breeding purposes at these different places. The harness and cart were used as the means of conveyance of the plaintiff on these trips, and they were clearly exempt, under the rule announced in Roberts v. Parker 117 Iowa, 389, 90 N. W. Rep. 744. Whether the plaintiff was at the time such a laborer *135as is contemplated by section 4.008 of the Code, which provides exemptions for specified occupations and for “other laborers, ” presents a more .difficult question. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Consolidated Tank-Line Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Boot v. GaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Wertz v. HaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Shepard v. FindleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API