Legal Opinion

Westall v. Marshall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1856PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Brazoria.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Ch. J.

There is a manifest error in the judgment. The petition alleges a balance due on a note, amounting to one hundred and fifty dollars and fifty-one cents, with interest at the rate of ten per cent., from the first day of January, eighteen hundred and fifty-four ; and the judgment is for three hundred and ninety-one dollars and twenty-five cents. This judgment was re-formed at a previous day of this Term, but the plaintiff in error was adjudged to pay costs, on the ground that the judgment might have been corrected with more convenience, and at less expense, by application to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McNairy v. CastleberryTexas Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. G. H. Pearce & Co. v. Tootle, Hosea & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. T. Ratto & Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884
  3. T. Ratto & Co. v. St. Paul's L. & M. Ins.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API