Legal Opinion

State v. Navarrette

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 6, 1977No. 1 CA-CR 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

The appellant, Richard J. Navarrette, was found guilty following a jury trial on four counts of commercially exhibiting obscene items in violation of A.R.S. § 13-532 A 2. Since appellant had previously been convicted of the same offense, he was subject to the increased felony penalties set forth in A.R.S. § 13-532 C. Appellant appeals from the convictions and the sentences thereon.

The items in question are four films, bearing the titles “Love Riders”; “Flossie —A Venus of 15”; “John Holmes — Playboy”; and “Travelin”. These films were exhibited on June 26,1975, at four locations…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. LimpusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. State v. BartanenArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kosidlo v. KosidloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Collins v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API