Van Dyke v. Cordova Copper Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this court to review judgments of the courts of a State rendered after statehood in cases transferred from the territorial court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice White,
by direction of the court.
This action was brought on December 2, 1911, by the Cordova Copper Company in the “District Court of the Fifth Judicial District of the Territory of Arizona in and for the County of Gila” to recover sums of money alleged to have been loaned to Van Dyke, the plaintiff in error, and remaining unpaid. The case was tried in April and May, 1912, after the admission of Arizona as a State, in the.“superior court of Gila county, State of Arizona” and resulted in a verdict on May 4 for $15,364.75, upon which judgment was entered on…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Metcalf v. Department of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- City of Covington v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Larkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Wainwright v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1918
- City of Tulsa v. WestonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.