Legal Opinion

Carstens v. Landrum

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1929No. 1249-5217PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

This suit was originally brought by Chas. G. Carstens against J. M. Landrum and wife on a promissory note for $2,000 and to foreclose a deed of trust lien on a tract of 200 acres of land in Atascosa county. Carstens died pending suit, and his executors have been duly made parties plaintiff. The note and the deed of trust securing it bear date April 12, 1918, but were in fact executed on April 15, 1918. The deed of trust was duly signed and acknowledged by both Landrum and his wife on the last-named date, and was delivered at the same time. The note represents a loan made on that date to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Archibald v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gardner v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. O'Brien v. WoeltzTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Parish Potter v. HawesTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Johnston v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Kendall Builders, Inc. v. Chesson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. First Texas Joint Stock Land Bank of Houston v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Lincoln v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Purdy v. GroveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. McMullan v. San Antonio Joint Stock Land Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API