Legal Opinion

Straub v. State of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The plaintiff challenged the complaint in the Justice’s Court by a motion upon the grounds that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime. Second, that the court had no jurisdiction to try the cause.

The complaint is in the form of an information of felony. The charging part is as follows:

“The said John Doe Straub on the 14th day of May, A. D. 1926, in the county of Benton and state of Oregon, then and there being did then and there unlawfully and ‘feloniously’ assault and beat one Anna B. Frantz, against the peace and dignity of the state of Oregon, and contrary to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. U'ren v. BagleyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Stockwell v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. State v. HumphreysOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Crook v. Newborg & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. State v. RaderOregon Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Henkel v. BradshawOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. OvalleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State Ex Rel. Maizels v. JubaOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API