Bendix Aviation Corporation v. Glass
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.
This is a motion by the plaintiff, based upon Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 39(a) (2), 28 U.S.C.A., to strike the defendant’s demand for a jury trial.
The complaint alleges that the defendant has refused to carry out a contract (made when he entered the plaintiff’s employ) to assign to the plaintiff a pending patent application and asks that the defendant be required to execute an assignment. The action is a simple suit for specific perform-' anee, as such, cognizable in equity.
The defendant filed an elaborate answer and -counterclaim. One of the numerous…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Eday Fabric Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. BurgerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harada v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Folkner v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of St. Joseph v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
- General Motors Corp. v. California Research Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.