Legal Opinion
United States v. Derrick Myran Frankson, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1996No. 95-5358, 95-5386PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILKINSON, Chief Judge:
Appellant Derrick Myran Frankson challenges his convictions for drug trafficking under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Frankson contends that his Miranda warnings were too general, that he never formally waived his Miranda rights, and that Miranda requires police to readvise suspects of their rights when the interrogation does not follow immediately upon the warnings. Finding no merit in these contentions, we affirm the admission into evidence of appellant’s statements as well as his convictions for possession with intent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Russel William Burket v. Ronald Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John Wayne Cardwell, United States of America v. Leo HinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Mitchell v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- United States v. Alejandro UmanaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.