Legal Opinion

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 22, 1886No. 12114PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The facts of this case are clearly set forth in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

Under this title two cases have been tried together which involve the decision of the obligations of the Government for the occupation as a temporary post-office of a building in Chicago owned by Mr. H. H. Honoré, and to which afterwards, and while in use for postal purposes, the claimants, through the foreclosure of a mortgage, obtained title.

The great fire of 1871 drove the Government to the temporary use of a church, where they remained until July, 1874, when, another fire evicting them, the postmaster, as became a faithful functionary, instantly began search for a new office, that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Floyd AcceptancesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Clinton Wire Cloth Co. v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Anderson v. PrindleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
  5. Gartside v. OutleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. LinthicumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  2. Post v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API