Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Julius Richman, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 12, 1978No. 76 C 2159PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS C. PLATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved this Court for an order pursuant to Rules 12 and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) granting it “summary judgment for the relief demanded in its complaint and striking the ‘Second Amended Verified Answer’ of the defendants and each and every affirmative defense and counterclaim contained therein on the grounds that the defendants have no defense to the complaint, that said affirmative defenses fail to state defenses to the claim set forth in plaintiff’s complaint, and that the counterclaims fail to state any claim upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wallace G. Frederick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc., and v. Santino D. Meo, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marian G. LeachCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Timbalier Towing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Julius Richman, Inc., and Lenore Richman, Individually and as of the Estate of Julius RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- In Re Woodstone Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. LeachCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985