Legal Opinion

Golden Rainbow Freedom Fund v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 26, 2001No. 00-36020; D.C. No. CV-99-00755-JCCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Golden Rainbow Freedom Fund, a Washington limited partnership, brought this action for the purpose of challenging the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s implementation of the Immigrant Investor Program, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(5), and the associated Immigrant Investor Pilot Program, Pub. L. No. 102-395, § 610, 106 Stat. 1874 (1992), as amended Pub. L. No. 105-119, § 116(a), 111 Stat. 2467 (1997), and Pub. L. No. 106-396, § 402, 114 Stat. 1647 (2000). The district court granted summary judgment to the INS and Golden Rainbow appealed. We affirm.

First, we agree with Golden Rainbow…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. R.L. Investment Limited Partners, and Wanxuan Zou v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golden Rainbow Freedom Fund v. Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API