Compton v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiff, while employed as a machinist in the roundhouse of defendant railroad company at Yuma, Arizona, and while working on a locomotive of defendant admittedly engaged in interstate commerce, received injuries for which this action was brought. The locomotive was in an unsafe condition in that the check valve on the boiler was defective causing steam to escape into the pump on which plaintiff was working. It is not contended that the unsafe condition was caused by the negligence of defendant or its employees, the sole basis of liability being that defendant violated the Boiler Inspection…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New York Central Railroad v. MarconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- McCalmont v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. KastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. HoovenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Michael Dennis Estes v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Lyle v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Netzer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Frastaci v. Vapor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Minehart v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.